Send to a Friend "Genealogy - A Primer on Tracing your Family History"
People who decide to trace their family histories generally seem to fall into of two groups: A) they know next to nothing about their family, and need to begin researching from scratch, or B) they already have a good knowledge about
their family, but need to document it properly and fill in some blanks.
You will send the story Genealogy - A Primer on Tracing your Family History to a specified friend:
People who decide to trace their family histories generally seem to fall into of two groups: A) they know next to nothing about their family, and need to begin researching from scratch, or B) they already have a good knowledge about
their family, but need to document it properly and fill in some blanks.
In both
situations, the records review will be the same, albeit it more intense for
people in situation A.
Researchers rely on numerous public and private resources and records to confirm
family connections. I fit these into a couple of categories as well: Primary
and Secondary, or Supplementary resources. Both categories of resources are
important and fulfill their own purposes in developing the family history. In
fact, they share a mutually complimentary effect with one another that should
not be overlooked by the diligent researcher, and will be explained hereafter.
Primary sources are the biggies, such as civil and church records describing
births, baptisms, confirmations, marriage, and deaths, census data, naturalization
records, newspaper articles, family bibles, and grave markers. All of these
records contain hard facts, with names, dates and family relationship landmarks,
and serve as the foundation and structure for the family members you are researching.
The Secondary or Supplementary resources provide filler information. You may
think of these resources as the ones that add details to bind and hold the structure
and foundation together. In other words, they round out the histories of the
family members you are discovering. These resources include city directories,
tax rolls, voter registrations, property indentures, letters, local history
books, photographs, and oral history. Don’t discount these resources! They provide
excellent details and can be crucial as you progress through your research work.
If you are starting your research from scratch, the best way to begin tracing
your family history is to start with yourself and work your way backward. Consider
the important facts, events and dates related to your own life, and what you
know about any siblings, and your parents. It’s best to keep a notebook handy
to jot things down as you begin your investigation. I also recommend using a
genealogy software program to input your research data and notes. After recording
details about your parents, move back to your grandparents, being careful to
document your reference sources as you regress.
I liken the research process to that of an ebb tide. It is a back and forth
flow of information, with highs and lows related to the amount of information
available during particular periods in our history. You may actually find it
harder to research family history in the 20th century than it is in the 19th
century. Why? Well, one reason is the federal census. Census information can
only be released to the public after 72 years. The 1930 Federal census was released
in 2002. Access to other recent public records, such as birth certificates,
can also be much more difficult to come by. I have found that records from the
mid-to-late 1800’s through the early 1900’s seem to be most plentiful. As one
regresses in time prior to the mid-1800’s, public records become increasingly
more difficult to find.
Consequently, one of the major problems with regressive research is that it
becomes increasingly difficult to verify family ties. Older records may be missing
first names, surnames, list only initials, or be so poorly written that they
lack sufficient or specific details to bind a connection (such as linking a
child to parents in a birth record, or linking a woman to her parents in a marriage
record). Another ‘show stopper’ problem is that, eventually, the researcher
will 'hit the wall' with the regressive research, and reach a point where there
simply aren’t any written records left to review. Generally, as one regresses
further and further in time, the more difficult it becomes to verify family
relations.
These problems are more often the rule, rather than the exception, for 'common
folk'. Researching families of stature or royalty is often less onerous (up
to a point), because these people have well documented historical references.
With an abundance of additional documentation and history to rely on, royals
and families of status can be traced back, in some cases, hundreds of years
further than common stock families. Rest assured, however, that one will eventually
hit the wall no matter who is being researched. For common people, the wall
is usually reached sooner, which translates into the verified lineage with a
smaller number of generations than that of royalty.
However, all is not lost if royal blood does not course through your veins and
leaves of stature do not fill the branches of your family tree. It may be possible
to extend your reach, and bridge ‘the wall’ for a period of time. For starters,
your research must be exceedingly thorough and balanced in approach. If it is,
and the conditions are right, you may be able to use a deductive reasoning technique
in your research processes to bridge the wall.
What do I mean by this? First let me tell you what deductive reason is not.
It is no guessing game, a stab in the dark, or a linkage of names simply because
you have found someone else’s family tree with the same surnames as the one
you are researching.
Deductive reasoning involves using a foundation of known information, and analyzing
it in such a way as to make valid, objective, educated arguments for a family
ancestral connection. Making such a case requires multiple pieces of information,
oftentimes with supplementary resources, that logically tie personal circumstances
together, consider facts that would otherwise exclude or negate the relationships
in question from being established (in other words, it would take into account
known details that would clearly contradict the relationship that the researcher
merely 'wants' to make), and at the same time, having met those prior conditions,
methodically and logically seems to 'fit' in with the known family history.
The more pieces of complimentary facts and information that can be considered,
obviously, the stronger the case becomes. Depending upon the particulars, there
may not be enough additional supplementary resources to make a deductive reasoning
insofar as establishing an additional family tie.
In my own case, I was able to apply the deductive reasoning approach with great
success. My family lineage stopped six generations back. However, I had strong
suspicions of linkage between my 6th generation ancestor and those who I believed
were his 7th generation parents. No single piece of information explicitly showed
this relationship. Partial names on birth certificates, marriage records, etc.,
prevented a definitive family tie from being established. However, additional
details, like birth dates, Godparents names on baptismal records, names of marriage
witnesses, references to known siblings, and other supplementary details were
enough to bridge this wall, and conclude that a direct family tie existed between
the 6th generation male and the 7th generation parents.
Once I made this connection, I was able to follow the 7th generation father
back another two generations. So, it was the deductive reasoning technique that
bridged the research wall, and gave me three full generations of lineage to
claim as my own. I hit the next wall when I determined the 9th generation father.
This wall was reached when my research records ran out. This time frame was
about the 1600’s, when the first written church records began in the Rhine area
where my ancestors once lived. With no earlier records to review, I do not have
enough secondary resources to deduce further ties earlier than the 9th generation
family. However, I continue to research, and if I come across additional resources,
I may, yet again, be able to bridge the genealogy wall.
Reviewing my case, I was reasonably sure that the family tie I deduced, based
upon all of the evidence I had collected, validated and objectively compared,
and not being contradictory to anything already relevant to my known ancestors,
was enough to confirm this 6th-7th generation relationship.
As it so happens, about a year after I had used my deductive reasoning technique
to determine this linkage, a friend from Germany sent me some very old records
he had obtained. Included therein was proof positive that the father-son link
I had deduced was, in fact, correct. Obviously this proof pleased me, but it
went further, confirming my own objective, meticulous genealogical research
processes. That confirmation was quite satisfying.
Deductive reasoning is not a technique that can be applied by everyone, but
it is a possible solution to consider when you’ve hit the genealogy wall, and
are looking for a way to break through it.
Best of luck as you trace your history!
This article is a brief primer on family history resources, research methods,
problems and solutions. It is intended to provide some general knowledge about
genealogy, tracing family history, and introduce the reader to the concept of
deductive reasoning and how it can be used in the research process.
Joseph Yakel is a freelance writer and author. His articles have appeared in
publications such as Communications Technology, The Pipeline, and Army Reserve
Magazine, and have been highlighted on USAWOA Online, USAR Online, and other
Internet websites. For great humor, or genealogy and family history resources,
visit his bookstore at http://www.lulu.com/yakel
where Joe offers free book previews and more. Joseph Yakel is available for
interviews, and accepts e-mail correspondence at armeuv1@yahoo.com
Related Forums:
|
