Send to a Friend "NY TIMES REPORTS 80M SUIT CLAIMING WHITEWASHING OF IVIEWIT COMPLAINTS"
A $80M SUIT www.iviewit.tv/CCA-2-amended.pdf FILED BY AN EMP/ATTORNEY OF THE NY SUPREME COURT CLAIMS DEPT OFFICIALS WHITE WASHED IVIEWIT COMPLAINTS FILED AGAINST PROSKAUER ROSE & COURT OFFICERS & PLAINTIFF WAS TERMINATED & ASSUALTED TO KEEP THE IVIEWIT CLAIMS OF FRAUD ON THE PATENT OFFICE BURIED
You will send the story NY TIMES REPORTS 80M SUIT CLAIMING WHITEWASHING OF IVIEWIT COMPLAINTS to a specified friend:
A $80M SUIT www.iviewit.tv/CCA-2-amended.pdf FILED BY AN EMP/ATTORNEY OF THE NY SUPREME COURT CLAIMS DEPT OFFICIALS WHITE WASHED IVIEWIT COMPLAINTS FILED AGAINST PROSKAUER ROSE & COURT OFFICERS & PLAINTIFF WAS TERMINATED & ASSUALTED TO KEEP THE IVIEWIT CLAIMS OF FRAUD ON THE PATENT OFFICE BURIED
The New York Law Journal, article @ http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1193648632218 the most widely read and respected legal publication in the United States, and The New York Times @ http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/01/nyregion/01suit.html?ref=nyregion , with a world wide circulation of more than one million readers, reported on a federal lawsuit claiming high ranking members on the New York Supreme Court, purposely and with intent to coverup for other high ranking court officials, caused the white washing of attorney complaints who committed hosts of state, federal, and international crimes against a multiplicity of governmental agencies, and in fact, threatened and coerced Plaintiff Anderson, including wrongfully terminating her and physical assault, for voicing concern that there was irrefutable evidence of wrongdoings.
In the lawsuit @ http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/CCA-2-amended.pdf filed on October 27, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, styled as Christine C. Anderson v. The State of New York, et. al. S.D.N.Y., October 27, 2007 the Plaintiff affirmatively claims support by the Iviewit matters of patent sabotage, intellectual property theft, and attempted murder perpetrated by, among others, the once respected Proskauer Rose LLP and its members Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane, (former New York State Bar President, former clerk to Chief Judge Judith Kaye), Chief Judge Judith Kaye and her late Proskauer partner husband Stephen Kaye, Christopher C. Wheeler, Foley & Lardner LLP led by its former Chairman and former Republican National Committee, Chief Counsel, Michael C. Grebe and others.
In that lawsuit, the Plaintiff factually alleges that:
Upon information and belief, defendants also state that the timing of the, Plaintiff’s abrupt firing was connected to the newly circulated revelations concerning Cahill's status as an individually named defendant in a lawsuit entitled In the Matter of Complaints Against Attorneys and Counselors-At-Law; Kenneth Rubenstein-Docket 2003.0531; Raymond Joao-Docket 2003.0532; Steven C. Krane- Docket 2004.1883; Thomas J. Cahill- Special Inquiry #2004.1122; and the Law Firm of Proskauer Rose, LLP; Eliot I. Bernstein, Pro Se and P. Stephen Lamont Both Individually and On Behalf of Shareholders of: Iviewit Corporation, et. al., Petitioners. [Iviewit’s]…petition was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division: First Department.
The Iviewit Petition for immediate investigation was later granted by the First Department Justices in a unanimous decision to begin immediate investigation for the Appearance of Impropriety and Conflict of Interest in Unpublished Orders:
• M3198 - Steven C. Krane & Proskauer Rose
• M2820 Kenneth Rubenstein & Proskauer Rose
• M3212 Raymond A. Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel and,
• Thomas J. Cahill – Special Inquiry #2004.1122 - Cahill was transferred for Special Inquiry and Investigation to Martin Gold per First Dept rules.
Original First Dept Complaints:
• Kenneth Rubenstein – Docket 2003.0531 First Department,
• Raymond Joao – Docket 2003.0532 First Department,
• Steven C. Krane – Docket 2004.1883 First Department,
• the Law Firm of Proskauer Rose, LLP and,
• the Law Firm of Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlissel
Additionally, and similar to the NYLJ and the NYT, as reported at http://www.corruptcourts.blogspot.com/, and among other areas, the Iviewit inquiries reach the highest levels of New York politics, and into many judicial chambers. The original inquiries revealed that New York ethics Chief Counsel Thomas J. Cahill of the First Department Disciplinary Committee white washed investigations, which recently led to his abrupt departure.
In a letter dated July 16, 2007, H. Marshall Jarret’s office, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, announced from its Washington, D.C. headquarters that it was expanding its investigation into a bizarrely stalled FBI and US Attorney investigation, initiated in 2001, that involves the theft from Iviewit of nearly 30 patents, trademarks and other intellectual properties, with an estimated value of a trillion dollars. The OPR investigation was sparked by a request from the DOJ – OIG, Inspector General Glenn Fine’s Office whom is also conducting an ongoing investigation. The probe reaches some of New York's most prominent politicians and judges, and has already proven to be a stunning embarrassment to the State's ethics watchdog committees.
As a backdrop to the technologies in question, Mr. Bernstein's inventions, the Iviewit video scaling and image overlay systems, are the backbone, enabling technologies for the transmission of video and images across almost all transmission networks and viewable on all display devices, an elegant upstream solution (towards the content creator) of reconfiguring video frames to unlock bandwidth, processing, and storage constraints -- the "Holy Grail" inventions of the digital imaging and video worlds that enable low bandwidth video on the Internet and mobile phones.
As previously reported, the U.S. Senate and U.S. House Judiciary Committees have known about the Iviewit investigation since about September of 2006; Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s office is also championing the Iviewit cause. The story is globally known in technical, intellectual property circles, with ongoing investigations at international patent offices as well.
Full information available at www.iviewit.tv, including full pertinent documentation and images of the car bombing attempt on inventor Bernstein’s life.
Authors – P. Stephen Lamont and Eliot I. Bernstein
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
Iviewit Holdings, Inc.
www.iviewit.tv
iviewit@iviewit.tv
530-529-4110
|
|
|
|